at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3la3bhtmkwg2s

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-11-03T22:40:40.978Z",
  "embed": {
    "$type": "app.bsky.embed.external",
    "external": {
      "description": "",
      "title": "",
      "uri": "https://github.com/CommunitySpecification/Community_Specification/blob/main/1._Community_Specification_License-v1.md"
    }
  },
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreieilelggpvipavkmq2vgjwxomamrs4bqqsnwxnbz4occwtu7ijzxi",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3la3b36yk6c2d"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiafpm6xlvcxdm3cd2ihnxz6g6qibpuyafhmnmiz3is3bmwwmevgka",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:jlyn3b6lglwi26kurerrnobk/app.bsky.feed.post/3l7zy6q7cvn2s"
    }
  },
  "text": "the Community Specification 1.0 license seems oriented around a \"Working Group\" concept? and we want to defer that to a \"real\" standards body. if you know of a similar license (or combination) which could apply to just our specification text, i'd be curious!"
}