at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3ksruwpqk5226

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-05-18T18:34:52.761Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreicmtoh7rboqa2uscmnv42ekietvktc5sxgmxnrosef3mz6w3hi2ny",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3ksruuenkms2h"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiefmtmfuvhu247535tojsaujcrhfmtu2lw3x33v6xtmtshag6qdri",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5qtf47soyj3stuno5vknxfb6/app.bsky.feed.post/3ksqg4zrqmi2y"
    }
  },
  "text": "that isn't to say we are against group-private content being part of atproto, it should just be a different mechanism from \"public repos\". maybe multiple repos? maybe PDS-to-PDS? still designing. but probably not a \"hack\" or tweak to the current repo architecture"
}